Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Politics

Federal judge undercuts Trump’s executive order on ‘radical gender ideology’

by October 9, 2025
October 9, 2025

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from forcing recipients of federal teen pregnancy prevention grants to follow new rules targeting ‘radical indoctrination’ and ‘gender ideology.’

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said President Donald Trump’s order was ‘motivated solely by political concerns, devoid of any considered process or analysis, and ignorant of the statutory emphasis on evidence-based programming.’

The ruling marked a victory for Planned Parenthood affiliates in California, Iowa and New York, who sued to try to block enforcement of a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) policy change. The ruling will apply to all organizations that receive grants. 

HHS, which oversees the program, declined to comment on Tuesday’s ruling.

HHS had previously said in a policy document issued in July that the guidance for the program ‘ensures that taxpayer dollars no longer support content that undermines parental rights, promotes radical gender ideology, or exposes children to sexually explicit material under the banner of public health.’

Planned Parenthood affiliates argued the new directives conflicted with the program’s requirements and were so vague that it was unclear how to comply.

Howell agreed, writing in her ruling that the HHS policy provided ‘incomprehensibly vague’ requirements and ‘seemingly relied on irrelevant ideological factors, and did not justify its change in position.’

The changes to the pregnancy prevention program were part of a series of executive orders Trump signed on his first day back in the White House.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
White House brutally mocks Kamala Harris’ ‘cackle’ after former VP drops F-bomb, suggests admin is ‘crazy’
next post
Green v. Tanner Brief: Juries, Not Judges, Need to Determine the Reasonableness of Mistaken Use of Force

You may also like

DOJ appeals dismissal of James, Comey criminal cases...

December 23, 2025

EXCLUSIVE: OIG report shows major turnaround in Social...

December 22, 2025

China quietly loads 100+ ICBMs into new missile...

December 22, 2025

DAVID MARCUS: What JD Vance told me about...

December 22, 2025

Anti-Trump ex-husband of president’s 2016 campaign manager launches...

December 22, 2025

Clinton camp demands DOJ drop remaining Epstein files,...

December 22, 2025

Turning Point poll reveals conservatives ‘all in’ for...

December 22, 2025

JD Vance turns Turning Point speech into midterm...

December 22, 2025

Trump admin recalling around 30 ambassadors as part...

December 22, 2025

‘No way’ Walz administration was unaware of Minnesota...

December 22, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • DOJ appeals dismissal of James, Comey criminal cases in long-shot legal gamble

    December 23, 2025
  • EXCLUSIVE: OIG report shows major turnaround in Social Security Administration’s phone service under Trump

    December 22, 2025
  • China quietly loads 100+ ICBMs into new missile silos near Mongolia: report

    December 22, 2025
  • The Trump Executive Order Is a Good Step for AI Policy

    December 22, 2025
  • DAVID MARCUS: What JD Vance told me about 2028, Rubio and the future of MAGA

    December 22, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 SecretAssetsOwners.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick