Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Should California Waive Environmental Laws?

by January 29, 2025
January 29, 2025

Jeffrey Miron

On January 12, California Governor Gavin Newson signed an executive order waving permitting requirements for homeowners and businesses affected by the fires in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. The directive suspends sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Coastal Act, aiming to expedite the rebuilding of as many as 12,000 homes destroyed in the fires.

Even before the fires, the typical home in California was $790,742, 220 percent of the national average. Moreover, the Wall Street Journal points out that California’s onerous building codes and permitting fees contribute to astronomical “affordable” housing costs, where units can cost $1 million to build. The state’s regulatory framework is widely regarded as a significant barrier to development; by requiring environmental reviews and opening the door for lawsuits, CEQA and the Coastal Act delay projects for years, driving up costs and discouraging investment.

Governor Newsom’s executive order waives permits previously justified as necessary for environmental protection and sustainable development. But if these regulations were essential before the fires, why suspend them now? The risks they seek to mitigate, such as soil erosion and waterway contamination, still exist post-fire and may be amplified by rushed rebuilding.

On the other hand, if these regulations were always excessive, then why limit their suspension to fire recovery? In the past, CEQA exemptions have been granted for high-profile projects such as sports stadiums and affordable housing developments. These cases highlight an inconsistency: the state recognizes that CEQA hinders timely and efficient development but has so far resisted broader reform. Why not reform or relax the laws to make them less onerous everywhere, rather than relying on piecemeal exceptions during crises?

Newsom’s executive order exposes a fundamental tension in California’s housing policy. If the regulations are too restrictive for disaster recovery, they are likely too restrictive broadly. And if they truly are necessary, they should remain, even in the face of the fires.

This article appeared on Substack on January 29, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

previous post
How DOJ Helps Federal Prosecutors Escape Accountability & Evade Public Scrutiny
next post
Scorched-earth Shanahan: RFK Jr.’s former running mate threatens political war against confirmation opponents

You may also like

The Declaration, the Constitution, and America’s 250th

December 24, 2025

DHS Doesn’t List CECOT Prison Deportees in Its...

December 23, 2025

Heritage Doesn’t Make Somebody an American

December 23, 2025

Schemel v. Marco Island Brief: Urging Limits on...

December 23, 2025

Singleton v. Hamm Brief: Federal Courthouses Should Hear...

December 23, 2025

SNAP Has an Eligibility Loophole. Congress Needs to...

December 23, 2025

The Trump Executive Order Is a Good Step...

December 22, 2025

Fiscal Policy Is Raising Costs for American Families

December 22, 2025

The FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act Cannot Have...

December 22, 2025

The Quiet Way the Fed Is Creating a...

December 22, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • North Korea releases images of development of nuclear-powered submarine

    December 25, 2025
  • Christmas Eve jazz concert canceled at Kennedy Center after Trump name added to building

    December 25, 2025
  • Nearly 20 states sue HHS over declaration to restrict gender transition treatment for minors

    December 25, 2025
  • Trump-backed candidate Asfura wins Honduras presidential election

    December 25, 2025
  • DOJ discovers more than 1M potential Epstein records, further delaying file release

    December 24, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 SecretAssetsOwners.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick