Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Trump Proposes to Socialize IVF

by August 30, 2024
August 30, 2024

Jeffrey A. Singer

On August 29, at a town hall in La Crosse, Wisconsin, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump told the audience, “I’m announcing today in a major statement that under the Trump administration, your government will pay for, or your insurance company will be mandated to pay for, all costs associated with IVF treatment.”

More than 13 percent of women and more than 11 percent of male peers in the US have fertility problems. In vitro fertilization (IVF) makes up more than 99 percent of assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, in 2021 more than 81,000 babies—2.3 percent of all those born in the US—were conceived using IVF. As more women choose to have children later in life, more are choosing IVF. In some European countries, women have used IVF to conceive 5 percent of newborns.

The price of a single IVF cycle (ovarian stimulation to egg retrieval to embryo transfer) can range from $15,000 to $30,000, depending upon the center and the medications required.

The government mandating that health insurers pay for IVF will raise premiums for all health insurance beneficiaries, regardless of age, sex, or lifestyle choices. To mitigate costs, insurers might raise deductibles and make provider networks narrower and less attractive to would-be fertility patients. Insurers would also intrude into reproductive decision-making through the authorization and approval process.

That authorization process will likely become even more inefficient and cumbersome if he forces taxpayers to pay for government-funded IVF, which Trump supports as an alternative. (Trump didn’t address the impact of such a program on the budget deficit.)

Whether indirectly, through health insurance mandates, or directly from a government program, Trump proposes to socialize IVF. For someone who has referred to Kamala Harris as “a socialist lunatic,” this is more than a little hypocritical.

previous post
Barriers to Energy Supply Are Everywhere—Let’s Get Serious about Permitting Reform
next post
Friday Feature: Detroit Catholic Central High School

You may also like

Friday Feature: Chesterton Schools Network

November 7, 2025

No Swords, No Subsidies: Let the Market Set...

November 6, 2025

More Evidence on the Minimum Wage

November 6, 2025

Is It the Government’s Job to Make Sure...

November 6, 2025

Homeownership and Wealth: Why Policymakers Should Stop Subsidizing...

November 6, 2025

Tillis Targets Debanking

November 6, 2025

A Double Standard on School Choice

November 5, 2025

Williamson v. United States Brief: Ten Months of...

November 5, 2025

Contra White House Claims, Removing IEEPA Tariffs Won’t...

November 5, 2025

Digging Deeper into School Resource Officers: School Shootings...

November 5, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Iran smuggled $1B to Hezbollah this year despite US sanctions, Treasury official says

    November 9, 2025
  • ‘Genocide can’t be ignored’: GOP lawmaker backs Trump’s threat of military action in Nigeria

    November 9, 2025
  • TEVI TROY: Celebrating 50 years of presidential mockery

    November 9, 2025
  • Reckoning looms for politicians as longest government shutdown persists

    November 9, 2025
  • Senate could take test vote on new spending bill as early as Sunday afternoon

    November 9, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 SecretAssetsOwners.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick