Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

by January 31, 2025
January 31, 2025

Jeffrey Miron

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.

This example illustrates a common justification for tariffs: that other countries engage in “unfair” trade practices, such as subsidizing their manufacturing firms. This claim is likely overstated; in many cases the costs of production are lower in poorer countries because labor costs are lower, even adjusting for skill levels.

But some countries do subsidize particular industries, which allows them to sell at lower prices relative to US producers. India provides favorable loans and tax breaks to its sugar industry, while the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy offers direct payments and market interventions to its farmers.

Is that a good reason for the US to impose tariffs on these countries?

No. Subsidies for particular industries harm the countries that adopt them by distorting the allocation of productive activity and forcing residents to pay higher taxes. But such policies benefit the United States overall: while some workers see less demand for their services, the US purchasers of the subsidized products face lower prices, and this stimulates demand, allowing for job creation instead of loss.

Historical evidence supports this: in the five years following the passage of NAFTA, which eliminated most tariffs and trade barriers between the United States, Mexico, and Canada, the unemployment rate fell to below 4 percent while the number of manufacturing jobs increased by half a million. Likewise, estimates from the International Trade Commission and the Peterson Institute suggest a modest positive impact on the labor market and the economy more broadly from the agreement.

If other countries want to “throw money out the window,” the US should stand under that window.

This article appeared on Substack on January 31, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

previous post
First American hostage to be released from Gaza, Hamas says
next post
Journavx: A Promising Opioid Alternative, but Not a Silver Bullet

You may also like

Friday Feature: Gilmer’s Learning Solutions

September 12, 2025

How Many Arrests Were Made? FinCEN Director Doesn’t...

September 12, 2025

Three Things You Should Know About the Record...

September 12, 2025

Politically Motivated Violence Is Rare in the United...

September 11, 2025

SOAR Act Update Could Unlock More Scholarship Funds...

September 11, 2025

The Toxic Legacy of 9/11…and How to End...

September 11, 2025

Trump Industrial Policy Delivers Make-Work Jobs

September 11, 2025

The President Should Not Have a License to...

September 10, 2025

Are Neoliberalism and Globalization Undermining Democracy?

September 10, 2025

The Latest National Test Scores: More Bad Productivity...

September 9, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Trump says ‘we’ll see what happens’ when asked about possibility of striking Venezuela amid rising tensions

    September 15, 2025
  • Turning Point USA says campus chapter requests surge to over 32,000 after Kirk’s assassination

    September 14, 2025
  • Death penalty looms for Charlie Kirk’s accused killer, but legal bar is high as Trump, Cox mount pressure

    September 14, 2025
  • From Zapruder to smartphones: Assassination footage reshapes America’s view of political violence

    September 14, 2025
  • Death penalty looms for Charlie Kirk’s accused killer but legal bar is high as Trump, Cox mount pressure

    September 14, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 SecretAssetsOwners.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick