Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Trump Proposes to Socialize IVF

by August 30, 2024
August 30, 2024

Jeffrey A. Singer

On August 29, at a town hall in La Crosse, Wisconsin, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump told the audience, “I’m announcing today in a major statement that under the Trump administration, your government will pay for, or your insurance company will be mandated to pay for, all costs associated with IVF treatment.”

More than 13 percent of women and more than 11 percent of male peers in the US have fertility problems. In vitro fertilization (IVF) makes up more than 99 percent of assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, in 2021 more than 81,000 babies—2.3 percent of all those born in the US—were conceived using IVF. As more women choose to have children later in life, more are choosing IVF. In some European countries, women have used IVF to conceive 5 percent of newborns.

The price of a single IVF cycle (ovarian stimulation to egg retrieval to embryo transfer) can range from $15,000 to $30,000, depending upon the center and the medications required.

The government mandating that health insurers pay for IVF will raise premiums for all health insurance beneficiaries, regardless of age, sex, or lifestyle choices. To mitigate costs, insurers might raise deductibles and make provider networks narrower and less attractive to would-be fertility patients. Insurers would also intrude into reproductive decision-making through the authorization and approval process.

That authorization process will likely become even more inefficient and cumbersome if he forces taxpayers to pay for government-funded IVF, which Trump supports as an alternative. (Trump didn’t address the impact of such a program on the budget deficit.)

Whether indirectly, through health insurance mandates, or directly from a government program, Trump proposes to socialize IVF. For someone who has referred to Kamala Harris as “a socialist lunatic,” this is more than a little hypocritical.

previous post
Barriers to Energy Supply Are Everywhere—Let’s Get Serious about Permitting Reform
next post
Friday Feature: Detroit Catholic Central High School

You may also like

Six Steps Kennedy Must Take to Deliver Radical...

September 5, 2025

Court Rightly Finds for Harvard Against Trump Administration

September 4, 2025

Join Us in Person or Online, September 11...

September 4, 2025

Congressional Democrats Try to Stop AG Bondi from...

September 4, 2025

Back to School for Higher Education

September 4, 2025

We Support Laws Against Actual Crimes, Unlike, Apparently,...

September 4, 2025

What the Google Antitrust Remedies Ruling Means for...

September 4, 2025

Reconciliation 2.0: Fix or Fiasco?

September 3, 2025

Back to School in the Era of Educational...

September 3, 2025

Beyond the Mugshot: When Those Who Enforce the...

September 3, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Venezuelan military jets buzz US Navy ship in ‘highly provocative’ move, Pentagon says

    September 5, 2025
  • Six Steps Kennedy Must Take to Deliver Radical Transparency

    September 5, 2025
  • Trump’s midterm convention is the seismic shift that will reshape America

    September 5, 2025
  • Republican doctors clash with RFK Jr over vaccines in tense Senate showdown

    September 5, 2025
  • Trump admin urges Supreme Court to allow president to fire Federal Trade Commission member

    September 5, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 SecretAssetsOwners.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick