Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Biden Proposal to Raise the Corporate Tax Rate

by March 7, 2024
March 7, 2024

Chris Edwards

President Biden is expected in his State of the Union address to propose raising the federal corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent. The administration says it wants to make “big corporations pay their fair share” and reverse the “massive tax giveaway to big corporations that Republicans enacted in 2017.”

A few thoughts.

Corporations pay income taxes, but the burden is passed on to workers, savers, and consumers. These individuals would pay the higher “share” that the administration is proposing. Corporations are just a politically convenient vehicle for collecting taxes on people.

In 2017, Republicans cut the federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, but they also broadened the corporate tax base in various ways. Also, corporations respond to tax rate cuts by investing more and avoiding and evading taxes less. Thus, the statutory rate cut was not a “massive tax giveaway.” Indeed, federal corporate tax revenues have soared since the GOP reform from $297 billion in 2017 to an expected $569 billion in 2024. The latter figure is inflated for temporary reasons, and revenues are expected to fall to $494 billion in 2025, but that is still up from 2017—not a giveaway.

One reason to retain a lower corporate tax rate is that America competes globally for job‐​creating investments. With average state taxes on top, the US corporate tax rate is 25.8 percent. That rate is already higher than the world average of 23.5 percent, according to the Tax Foundation, and the Biden proposal would further reduce our competitiveness.

Contrary to the administration, I think America should have the best tax environment in the world for entrepreneurs and business investment. The real “massive giveaways” are President Biden’s special handouts for politically favored industries such as energy, automobiles, and semiconductors. It’s better to have low and equal tax rates for all than subsidies for the few.

Read further Cato commentary on taxes from Adam Michel and Chris Edwards.

previous post
Senator Wicker Can’t Wave away Our Dangerous Jones Act Reality
next post
China, Russia float idea for nuclear power on the moon: ‘want to upstage the United States’

You may also like

Ukrainian Refugees Probably Didn’t Reduce the Birth Rate...

July 14, 2025

Vaping, Panic, and Prohibition: Why the UC-Davis Study...

July 14, 2025

The First Amendment Protects Ideologically Based Ad Boycotts

July 11, 2025

A Dash for Cash: What to Do About...

July 11, 2025

Friday Feature: Mt. Haven Microschool

July 11, 2025

New Tariffs Will Push Countries Closer to China

July 10, 2025

A Fiscal Hawk’s Defense of the GOP’s Deficit-Busting...

July 10, 2025

Charles Fain Lehman’s War on Weed

July 10, 2025

Seizing AI’s Trillion Dollar Cyber Opportunity

July 9, 2025

Henry Hazlitt’s Timeless Lesson: Still Refuting Today’s Economic...

July 9, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Pentagon presses Japan, Australia on role in possible Taiwan conflict

    July 14, 2025
  • Democrats seize on Epstein files drama with new transparency calls

    July 14, 2025
  • ‘One more’: Senate Republicans eye tackling another reconciliation bill

    July 14, 2025
  • Biden chief of staff reportedly gave approval for autopen pardons on final day in office

    July 14, 2025
  • Ukrainian Refugees Probably Didn’t Reduce the Birth Rate in Czechia

    July 14, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 SecretAssetsOwners.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
Secret Assets Owners
  • Investing
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick